Page 46 - 08.11.2025 Council Packet
P. 46

3.  Building envelope
                3.1. Existing buildings are located at the tipping point of topography on the site
                    3.1.1.  Pushing proposed buildings or parking further rear than the current building envelope
                         would likely involve more earth-work at construction and possible import/export of dirt for
                         proposed grading scheme

             4.  Outdoor amenities
                4.1. Current scheme of placing outdoor amenities (i.e. play yards) at rear on existing slope is
                    advantageous to drainage and extended useability of these types of outdoor spaces
                    4.1.1.  Outdoor amenities located in flat, low-lying field at rear of site would mean they are
                         muddy or wet after rain events
                4.2. Proposed amenities within low-lying areas will need to be designed to function in wet soils
                    4.2.1.  An example could be a paved sports court accessed by a well-drained trail
                4.3. Outdoor amenities that cannot avoid the possibly wet soil will need to employ stormwater
                    management and drainage design solutions to convey water off-site
                    4.3.1.  An example is a community garden that drains into vegetated swales or in-ground
                         drains

             5.  Stormwater Management
                5.1. The existing pond on the property may assist in meeting the required stormwater
                    management requirements for the site
                5.2. Additional facilities that may treat water quality, or retain water during storm events, may be
                    required on the subject site to meet state regulations. The size and location of these facilities
                    are highly dependent on the ultimate size and arrangement of the future site and proposed
                    infrastructure
                    5.2.1.  The amount of impervious area on the property is a critical metric to determine the
                         course of action for future stormwater management practices, and this has not been
                         determined at this phase of the project
                5.3. Bioretention facilities that may be required are opportunities for informal and self-lead
                    education for visitors of all ages to learn about plants, bugs, animals and the water-cycle

             6.  Utilities
                6.1. Existing utilities observed on the property (not verified through site survey) are:
                    6.1.1.  Electricity
                    6.1.2.  Telephone
                    6.1.3.  Verizon (cable or internet)
                    6.1.4.  Public Water
                    6.1.5.  Public Sanitary Sewer
                6.2. Propane / natural gas storage yard was observed at rear of existing buildings
                    6.2.1.  Indicates no gas main available for service to site

             7.  Vegetation
                7.1. Existing vegetation at the front of the property is largely healthy and of reasonable
                    appearance and maintenance
                    7.1.1.  This vegetation has the potential to be retained and incorporated in site redevelopment


                                                                 08.11.25 Council Packet Page 46 of 140
              TOWN OF BERLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: FEASIBILITY STUDY                                                   23
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51